MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362541216 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-2993

Abstract 2993: Unmutated tumor antigens are abundant and contribute to tumor control in melanoma

2023· article· en· W4362541216 on OpenAlexaff
Anca Apavaloaei, Qingchuan Zhao, Leslie Hesnard, Krystel Vincent, Marie‐Pierre Hardy, Chantal Durette, Joël Lanoix, Jean‐Philippe Laverdure, Jean‐David Larouche, Maria Virginia Ruiz Cuevas, Grégory Ehx, Sébastien Lemieux, Pierre Thibault, Claude Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMelanomaAntigenCancer researchImmune checkpointBiologyImmunotherapyMajor histocompatibility complexTumor antigenImmune systemImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recognition of MHC-I-associated tumor antigens (TAs) by CD8+ T cells is central to antitumor immunity. Owing to the elevated tumor mutational burden (TMB) in melanoma, the marked efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has been attributed to the recognition of mutated TAs. However, recent reports showed that response to ICB in melanomas with low TMB is associated with CD8+ T-cell reactivity against melanocyte lineage-associated antigens (LSAs). Here, we systematically evaluated the contribution of all TA classes, i.e., mutated and unmutated, canonical and non-canonical, to the antigenic landscape of melanoma. We characterized the TAs from melanoma biopsies and patient-derived cell lines using proteogenomics. Out of 79450 MHC-I-associated peptides (MAPs) identified from 19 samples, we found 557 unmutated TAs classified as tumor-specific (TSA), tumor-associated (TAA), or LSAs. These TAs most often derived from annotated open-reading frames, followed by ncRNAs and intergenic regions. By contrast, only 6 MAPs were mutated and tumor-specific, which could be partially explained by a decreased expression of mutations within MAP-generating genomic regions. While the number of unmutated TAs with predicted presentation (TApres) in melanoma patients was similar between responders and non-responders pre-ICB, non-responders showed marks of inefficient antigen presentation. In consequence, only responders lost TApres upon treatment, in tandem with an expansion in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. These results reveal a previously underappreciated contribution of unmutated TAs to tumor control in melanoma and suggest that enhancing their recognition could improve the ICB efficacy in non-responders. Citation Format: Anca Apavaloaei, Qingchuan Zhao, Leslie Hesnard, Krystel Vincent, Marie-Pierre Hardy, Chantal Durette, Joël Lanoix, Jean-Philippe Laverdure, Jean-David Larouche, Maria Virginia Ruiz Cuevas, Grégory Ehx, Sébastien Lemieux, Pierre Thibault, Claude Perreault. Unmutated tumor antigens are abundant and contribute to tumor control in melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2993.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→