MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362575567 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15380

Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Using Genetic Algorithm Based Nonlinear Autoregressive Exogenous Network

2023· dissertation· en· W4362575567 on OpenAlexaff
Yitong Shen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsNonlinear autoregressive exogenous modelArtificial neural networkAutoregressive modelGenetic algorithmProton exchange membrane fuel cellNonlinear systemAlgorithmBackpropagationComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringMachine learningFuel cellsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is one of the most promising clean energy sources with characteristics like high energy conversion, no electrolyte leakage, and low operational temperature.However, it is difficult to build a mathematical model because the system consists of a complex nonlinear system.In the meantime, accurate estimation of the remaining useful life (RUL) of fuel cells plays an important role in improving the safety and lifetime of fuel cells.A joint prediction method based on genetic algorithm (GA) and nonlinear autoregressive neural network with external input (NARX) is proposed.The method was designed to predict the RUL of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell.GA is used to optimize the initial weights and biases of the NARX neural network.Then, the historical voltage evolution under rated current conditions is used to train the NARX network, where the trained model is used to predict the voltage evolution under ripple conditions.Integrating the GA-NARX algorithm leads to the improvement of convergence speed and the prediction accuracy of the algorithm.This integrated algorithm obtains better estimation accuracy compared to the NARX network by itself.The proposed method was compared with the genetic algorithm-based backpropagation neural network (GA-BPNN) and genetic algorithm-based time delay neural network (GA-TDNN).The proposed method is validated with the IEEE PHM 2014 Data Challenge dataset and the resultsshowed that the method has better prediction accuracy compared to other ANN algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→