MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362575947 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15456

Anisotropy and Non-coaxial Behaviour of Sand Along Different Strain Paths

2023· dissertation· en· W4362575947 on OpenAlexaff
Premnath Selvarajah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShearing (physics)Geotechnical engineeringAnisotropyConsolidation (business)Stress pathMaterials scienceShear stressPlane stressIsotropyPlasticityPrincipal stressShear (geology)Principal axis theoremGeologyMechanicsGeometryComposite materialStructural engineeringMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsOpticsFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anisotropic characteristics of granular soil, consolidated to various initial stress states, were evaluated under generalized strain paths using hollow cylinder torsional shear tests.Fraser River sand samples prepared by water pluviation were subjected to isotropic and anisotropic consolidation stresses and sheared under undrained conditions along specific strain paths characterized by constant intermediate principal strain parameter (𝑏 𝜀 ) and various fixed principal strain directions (𝛼 𝜀 ).A series of tests along different inclinations of the major principal strain with respect to the vertical depositional direction permitted an assessment of the interaction between principal strain directions and fabric.A decrease in strain hardening tendency is observed as the major principal strain aligned towards the bedding plane.Considering different levels of anisotropic consolidation stresses also allowed a detailed examination of how initial static shear affects the responses.In particular, generated principal stresses and their direction, as well as the pore pressure responses, were closely examined.Novel findings, that highlight range of intermediate principal stress parameter (𝑏 𝜎 ) associated with the undrained plane strain condition, and the interaction between 𝑏 𝜎 and 𝑏 𝜀 during shearing are presented.It was found that 𝑏 𝜎 systematically decreases with shear strain in constant 𝑏 𝜀 tests.The 𝑏 𝜎 value in plane strain tests (𝑏 𝜀 =0.5) was found to be in the range of 0.2 to 0.4 depending on the loading path, and the stage of shearing.The relationship between principal stress directions and plastic-strain increment directions was assessed to identify the nature of plasticity in the material.In order to ensure confident assessment of non-coaxiality, total strain was decomposed into elastic and plastic strain.The existence of non-coaxiality in Fraser River sand (FRS) was observed when the sand was subjected to undrained shear at fixed principal strain directions that do not coincide with the fabric axis of symmetry.Non-coaxiality was not observed when the principal directions of stress/strain coincided with the fabric axis of symmetry.It was also noticed that irrespective of the initial condition, the degree 7 Conclusions and Recommendations 7.1 Recommendations for future research . . . . . . . . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics→French-language works237,207→