The role of calcite mineral elastic moduli in carbonate rock physics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rock-physics models for carbonate reservoirs assume that the mineral elastic moduli are known variables. A review of publications reveals a range of values for calcite that are out of date and misleading. We present a robust compilation for future investigations. We subsequently discuss the application of calcite elastic moduli for rock-physics modeling and interpretation of wireline data through a case study data set from an offshore Canada carbonate reservoir. The data set exhibits an offset between the zero-porosity intercept and the calcite elastic moduli values. Our experience indicates that this phenomenon is present in many wireline data sets from carbonate reservoirs around the world. We demonstrate that the data can be reconciled to the mineral elastic moduli through the interpretation of microcracks in the formation (defined by a crack density of 0.06). Understanding the microcrack effect in relatively low-porosity formations is important for the correct calibration of pore microstructure parameters and for fluid-substitution calculations. Results in the case study data set show a relatively high sensitivity to changes in fluid saturation. The sensitivity can be reduced through the use of effective mineral elastic moduli that are derived from the data. We justify the effective mineral elastic moduli as a representation of the mineral moduli plus microcracks. The effective mineral elastic moduli are proposed as a relatively simple method to constrain the fluid substitution calculations in low-porosity formations where microcracks are present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".