MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362590911 · doi:10.1049/ell2.12766

CNN‐based received signal strength prediction: A frequency conversion scheme

2023· article· en· W4362590911 on OpenAlexaff
Siyi Huang, Xingqi Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCHIST-ERA
KeywordsRSSComputer scienceSignal strengthDiscretizationRadio propagationConvolutional neural networkSIGNAL (programming language)WirelessRadio frequencySoftware deploymentElectronic engineeringReal-time computingSimulationTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To support the design and deployment of emerging high‐frequency wireless systems in various applications such as intelligent transportation, advanced received signal strength (RSS) simulation tools for radio coverage prediction are needed. In railway transportation, the vector parabolic equation (VPE) method is a commonly used approach for radio wave propagation modelling in large guiding structures such as tunnels. However, running VPE simulations at high frequencies in such an environment is computationally expensive, as the discretization parameters are closely related to the wavelength. In this letter, the authors propose a convolutional neural network‐based model that can efficiently provide RSS prediction at high frequencies by leveraging data obtained from VPE simulations at a lower frequency as an anchor. This proposed model can significantly improve the efficiency of VPE for high‐frequency RSS predictions and has been validated against conventional VPE in various tunnel cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207