MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362592058 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-5142

Abstract 5142: 50-parameter flow cytometry by CyTOF empowers comprehensive single-cell immune profiling of pulmonary immunosenescence in aged mice

2023· article· en· W4362592058 on OpenAlexaff
Wenxi Xu, Stephen Li, Alexandre Bouzekri, Lauren Tracey

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsIntegrity Testing Laboratory (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunosenescenceMass cytometryFlow cytometryImmune systemImmunologyBiologyAntibodyPhenotypeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-parameter flow cytometry is essential for human and mouse studies to discover novel immunological mechanisms of cancer, infections, and immunosenescence. It plays an increasingly important role in cancer research to ensure clinical therapeutic success but is limited by the large amount of cell samples needed for staining controls. CyTOF® technology has transformed flow cytometry by enabling 50-plus-marker analysis per tube of sample, with easy panel design and no need for single-stained or autofluorescence controls. Flow cytometry by CyTOF provides an efficient and unbiased approach to discovering novel subsets and unique functional states of immune cells, maximizing insights from precious samples. Immunosenescence perturbs lung cancer onset and development, yet the mechanisms remain largely unknown. To study the pulmonary immune populations in aged (75 weeks old) and young adult (6-8 weeks old) mice, we built a 50-parameter panel (2 for single live-cell identification, 6 for live-cell sample barcoding, and 42 for immune profiling). A core panel of 32 antibodies was selected from Standard BioTools™ catalogs to detect key cell lineage and functional surface markers. A complementary panel with 10 Maxpar® antibodies was added to further study functional cell states. Maxpar Pathsetter™ software was used to create an automated analytical model for high-dimensional analysis. The 50-parameter panel successfully identified over 30 lymphoid and myeloid cell subsets including but not limited to T cells, B cells, NK cells, alveolar macrophages (AMs), dendritic cells, and neutrophils. The panel enabled high-fidelity detection of over 15 functional markers mediating proliferation, activation, inhibition, migration, tissue residence, and cellular metabolism. Automated in-depth analysis by Maxpar Pathsetter efficiently identified many aging-associated alterations in cell frequencies and functional states such as the enrichment of PD-1+ T cells and CD27- γδ T cells that could potentially perturb anti-tumor immunity. Moreover, CyTOF technology is uniquely advanced in characterizing autofluorescent cells such as AMs. A pro-inflammatory state (higher expression of MHC-II, CD80, and PD-L1) was specifically defined for AMs in aged lungs. This study demonstrates comprehensive single-cell immune profiling of mouse tissues with the products and solutions provided by Standard BioTools. Both the 50-parameter panel and Maxpar Pathsetter analytical model can be customized for deep characterization of specific immune populations according to the requirements of various cancer studies in mice. By utilizing end-to-end solutions offered by Standard BioTools, flow cytometry by CyTOF can significantly facilitate the mechanistic studies of mouse models to expand the understanding of human cancers and accelerate therapeutic development. Citation Format: Wenxi Xu, Stephen Li, Alexandre Bouzekri, Lauren Tracey, Christina Loh. 50-parameter flow cytometry by CyTOF empowers comprehensive single-cell immune profiling of pulmonary immunosenescence in aged mice. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5142.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207