MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362593083 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-3998

Abstract 3998: Metronomic gemcitabine plus neratinib effectively inhibits the growth of human Her-2 positive breast cancer cells intracranially implanted into immunodeficient mice

2023· article· en· W4362593083 on OpenAlexaff
Serina A. Batson, Alejandro Sánchez, Hector M. Padilla, Diana L. Prospero, Brenda Lugo, Valeria V. Lopez, Daniella E. Estrada, Nydia De Avila, Saeedeh Darvishi, Arlene Levario, Shan Man, Ping Xu, Robert S. Kerbel, Guido Bocci, Giulio Francia

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeratinibGemcitabineLapatinibMedicineBreast cancerOncologyCancerMetastatic breast cancerInternal medicineIn vivoCancer researchTrastuzumabBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metastatic breast cancer is a major cause of death for women in the US, and breast cancers that metastasize to the brain have a particularly poor prognosis. To treat brain metastases of Her-2 positive breast cancers a number of Her-2 targeting drugs are now clinically available, including lapatinib, neratinib and tucatinib, among others. However, in part as a consequence of poor penetration of many drugs into the brain, combinations of standard chemotherapy plus targeted agent have only modest impact on progression free survival for such patients. We have developed preclinical models of human Her-2 positive breast cancer brain metastases to help address these issues. We selected human MDA-MD-361 and BT474 breast cancer cells lines by in vivo passaging in SCID mice, followed by molecular tagging of the derived variants (MDA361R and BT474R respectively), and then the stereotactic implantation of such cells into the brain of female SCID mice. Using luciferase-tagged BT474R we implanted 75,000 cells into the brains of the mice, and thereafter confirmed by luminescence the growth of the cells, which allowed for randomization of the mice to receive control saline (n=7), metronomic gemcitabine (100mg/kg/3days; i.p.; n=8), neratinib (40mg/kg/3 days; p.o.; n=7), or the combination of gemcitabine plus neratinib (n=8), which continued for 5 months largely in the absence of overt toxicity. The gemcitabine plus neratinib combination prolonged survival over the controls (150 days vs 65 days, p<0.5), although eventually all mice succumbed to disease. Tumors cells have been isolated from these therapy-administered mice for further characterization. Neratinib alone did not result in an increase in survival compared to controls, whereas metronomic gemcitabine improved survival but was inferior to the combination. We confirmed these findings using MDA361R tagged with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), which allows for the growth of cells to be monitored by assessment of hCG in the mouse urine, and these cells were implanted intracranially into female SCID mice. After urine hCG levels confirmed the presence of growing cells in the brain, the mice were randomized to the above 4 therapies (n=4/group), which showed an increase in survival of the combination compared to controls. These results point to intriguing effects of chemotherapy when used at continuous low (metronomic) doses, that in these studies involved gemcitabine administration every 3 days, and which in these models can be effectively combined with neratinib to suppress the growth of Her-2 positive breast cancer cells implanted into the mouse brain. These results highlight promising combination that could be used to suppress Her-2 positive breast cancer brain metastatic growth, and the developed models should facilitate the study of this subset of breast cancers. Citation Format: Serina Batson, Alejandro Sanchez, Hector M. Padilla, Diana L. Prospero, Brenda Lugo, Valeria V. Lopez, Daniella E. Estrada, Nydia De Avila, Saeedeh Darvishi, Arlene Levario, Shan Man, Ping Xu, Robert S. Kerbel, Guido Bocci, Giulio Francia. Metronomic gemcitabine plus neratinib effectively inhibits the growth of human Her-2 positive breast cancer cells intracranially implanted into immunodeficient mice. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3998.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207