MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract SY31-02: Determinants of hypoxia in pancreatic cancer and identification of ULK1 as a potential therapeutic target

2023· article· en· W4362597000 on OpenAlexaff
Ji Zhang, Dan Cojocari, Rob A. Cairns, Marianne Koritzinsky, Bradly G. Wouters

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoxia (environmental)Tumor microenvironmentCancer researchTumor hypoxiaPancreatic cancerImmune systemRadiation therapyBiologyMedicineCancerImmunologyInternal medicineOxygenChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The effectiveness of radiation treatment is impacted by spatially defined features of the tumor microenvironment including areas of tumor hypoxia. This is due in part to direct protection against radiation damage by hypoxia, as well as through the influence of hypoxia on tumor, stroma and immune cell phenotypes. Despite this understanding, our progress in advancing therapies to address tumor hypoxia in patients have been largely unsuccessful. This is driven in part to the incredible variability in tumor hypoxia across patients as well as to a limited understanding of the underlying causes and consequences of hypoxia on an individual patient basis. As a step towards more precision approaches for hypoxia directed therapies we are characterizing hypoxia and its causes in individual patients and in matched patient derived xenografts. Our data reveal a striking variation in hypoxia across patients, and a corresponding variation in both oxygen consumption and hypoxia tolerance in patient derived organoids. We hypothesize that levels of hypoxia within individual tumors are determined through separate processes that drive changes in oxygen demand coupled with those that influence adaptation and survival to hypoxic stress. We have also identified ULK1 as a key contributor to both of these processes. Loss or inhibition of ULK1, a gene activated downstream of the unfolded protein response during hypoxia, results in defects in both mitochondrial and ER turnover leading to increases in both oxygen consumption and ER stress. Consequently, knockdown of ULK1 in established pancreatic cancer xenografts results in development of more hypoxia, while at the same time promotes the death of cells that become hypoxic. This has a dramatic impact on tumor growth, leading to complete remission in some models and suggesting that ULK1 should be pursued as a tumor microenvironment therapeutic target. Citation Format: Ji Zhang, Dan Cojocari, Rob Cairns, Marianne Koritzinsky, Bradly G. Wouters. Determinants of hypoxia in pancreatic cancer and identification of ULK1 as a potential therapeutic target. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr SY31-02.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→