When is a pyridine not a pyridine? Benzannulated <i>N</i>-heterocyclic ligands in molecular materials chemistry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The C═N bond is a critical structural piece of many N-donor ligand scaffolds and is central to the properties and reactivity of important coordination complexes. For example, C═N units play a key role in the “redox non-innocence” of α-diimine complexes and in making charge-transfer excited-state character available to complexes of N-heterocyclic ligands such as bipyridine. In N-heterocycles like pyridine, benzannulation can be used to extend the conjugated C═N-containing π-system to quinoline (2,3-benzopyridine) to acridine (2,3-benzoquinoline). This stabilizes the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital of the molecule and boosts its electron-accepting properties, but the position of the benzannulation matters. For example, phenanthridine (3,4-benzoquinoline), an asymmetric isomer of acridine, bears a similarly electronically accessible extended π-system but with a more chemically isolated “imine-like” C═N moiety. This award paper presents an overview of our work investigating the impact of such site-selective benzannulation on the chemistry and properties of phenanthridine as a molecule and ligand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".