MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362651012 · doi:10.21567/adhyayan.v12i1.6

Select Studies on the Impact of Pandemic and Product Pricing: A Case Study on Parle-G Brand

2022· article· en· W4362651012 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mithun Nandy, Soma S Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueAdhyayan A Journal of Management Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessProduct (mathematics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)AuditPandemicAdvertisingMarketingCommerceGeographyMathematicsAccountingMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The selling of Parle-G biscuit recorded the highest sales among all biscuit companies operating in the Indian FMCG market during the lockdown period of India. The 1st quarter (April-June) audited sales of Parle-G of the financial year 2020-2021 broke all the records of past 9 decades sales i.e. for the period of 1929 to 2020 since from the inception of the company:‘Parle Products’ followed by selling Parle-G biscuit brand having a maximum retail price of INR ₹5 and INR ₹2 in the biscuit category products. This proposed teaching case searches for answers like how come Parle-G had set the record by selling even extremely low-priced biscuit pack sizes like INR ₹5 and INR ₹2 in spite of the pandemic and lockdown time? An attempt has also been provided in this case study to underline how the poor people had been impacted by the Parle-G biscuit product during the unprecedented pandemic. This case also highlights the crucial factors which had enabled Parle-G for setting the sales record and enjoying a substantial market share in the biscuit segment in India during the aforesaid period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdhyayan A Journal of Management SciencesSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207