MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362653992 · doi:10.24036/jeal.v1i1.237

Profil smk negeri 3 solok ditinjau dari standar sarana dan prasarana pendidikan

2022· article· en· W4362653992 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Educational Administration and Leadership · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Research and Methods
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocumentationSimple random samplePopulationData collectionNonprobability samplingResearch methodProbability samplingSample (material)Mathematics educationComputer scienceMathematicsStatisticsBusinessSociologyPhysicsBusiness administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research intends to obtain a comparison of the standard of facilities and infrastructure of SMK Negeri 3 Solok with Permendiknas number 40 of 2008. The comparison of facilities and infrastructure is reviewed from several aspects, namely land, buildings and the completeness of educational facilities and infrastructure. The research questions as follows are 1) how is the suitability of the land in SMK Negeri 3 Solok with the standards of existing facilities and infrastructure, 2) how is the suitability of the buildings in SMK Negeri 3 Solok with the standards of existing facilities and infrastructure, and 3) how is the suitability of completeness of existing educational facilities and infrastructure at SMK Negeri 3 Solok with the standard of existing facilities and infrastructure. The population of this research amounted to 451 people and a sample of 51 people with sampling using proportional simple random sampling technique. Data collection techniques using interviews, observation and documentation. Where the interviews were conducted by asking the contents of the guidelines for the table of contents that the author had prepared. The data analysis technique in this study is to compare the results of observations, checklists based on interviews and documentation that the author has done. The results of the study concluded that the building area of the land area is as much as 70% with the presence of some vacant land. The height of the school building is 28 m, which meets the maximum requirements for a building as high as 30 m. The condition of the floor of the SMK N 3 Solok building is in the good category. The school's distance from highways, rivers, railroads, and high-voltage channels is quite safe. the distance between the school and the equivalent building behind or beside the school building is considered safe with a distance of approximately 10 m. Meanwhile, for the completeness of the infrastructure there are still not in accordance with the standards, such as the prayer room that does not function properly, the UKS room and student organization rooms are not yet available, the counseling room is still temporary, and the number of bathrooms for female students whose ratio does not match the number of students. students and also spacious for the practice space of the three majors at SMK Negeri 3 Solok.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.247
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it