Decoding the Cure-all Effects of Ginseng
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ginseng has been known as a “cure-all” traditional medicine to treat various illnesses and as an adaptogen to relieve stress. However, the known active compounds of ginseng are small-molecule metabolites. Here we report ginsentides, which are disulfide-dense, super-stable and cell-penetrating peptides with 31–33 amino acids, as active compounds and adaptogens that restore homeostasis in response to stress. Using mass spectrometry-based target identification and functional studies, we show that ginsentides promote vasorelaxation by producing nitric oxide through endothelial cells via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Ginsentides were also found to alleviate α1-adrenergic receptor overactivity by reversing phenylephrine-induced constriction of the aorta, decrease monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells via CD166/ESAM/CD40, inhibit P2Y12 receptors, reduce platelet aggregation, and thrombus formation in the lung. Orally administered ginsentides were effective in anti-stress behavior using animal models of tail suspension and forced swimming tests. Together, these results suggest that ginsentides interact with multiple systems to restore homeostasis by reversing stress-induced physiological changes and provide new insights into the panacea medicinal effects of ginseng.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".