MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Amorphous Silica-Alumina-Catalyzed Alkene-Aromatic Alkylation of Cracked Naphtha: Cyclopentene Species as Precursors for Catalyst Deactivation

2023· article· en· W4362663832 on OpenAlexafffund
Giselle Uzcátegui, Arno de Klerk

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesChina National Offshore Oil Corporation
KeywordsCyclopenteneChemistryCatalysisAlkeneNaphthaEthylbenzeneDecalinOrganic chemistryDiphenylmethaneCyclohexenePhotochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acid-catalyzed alkene-aromatic alkylation of cracked naphtha is a process of interest for partial upgrading of bitumen without hydrogen. The time-on-stream period before catalyst regeneration is necessary and is affected by formation of carbonaceous deposits (coking). It was postulated that 5-membered ring cyclic alkenes like cyclopentenes were important precursors for catalyst deactivation by coking, compared to linear alkenes. Using cracked naphtha, it was demonstrated that at 300 °C, cyclopentene species were converted both thermally and catalytically. The extent of catalytic conversion increased with Brønsted acidity of the catalyst. To better interpret the findings, model mixtures comprising cyclopentene, 1-hexene, ethylbenzene, and n -heptane were used to compare the impact of the different alkenes to catalyst coking. The three main products detected from acid-catalyzed cyclopentene reactions were trans -decalin, cis -decalin, and bicyclopentylidene. A plausible explanation of the pathway with a common intermediate was presented. Differences between conversion of cyclopentene and 1-hexene were explained in terms of the lower basicity of cyclopentene compared to that of 1-hexene, which also explained why cyclopentene conversion was suppressed by ethylbenzene through competitive adsorption on the acid catalyst but not that of 1-hexene. Catalyst coking was evaluated using electron spin resonance spectrometry. Compared to 1-hexene, cyclopentene produced 3–4 times more products with persistent free radicals and was not affected by the presence of ethylbenzene in the reaction mixture, evidencing that it has a more pronounced impact in catalyst coking. However, the extent of coking on the silica-alumina catalyst caused by cyclopentene was insufficient to account all the coking of cracked naphtha, which on equal alkene concentration basis was 2 times more prone to coking than cyclopentene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & Fuels→Same topicPetroleum Processing and Analysis→French-language works237,207→