MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362675472 · doi:10.2138/am-2022-8770

Molybdenite-bearing vugs in microgranite in the Preissac pluton, Québec, Canada: Relicts of aqueous fluid pockets?

2023· article· en· W4362675472 on OpenAlexaffabout
Thomas Mulja, Anthony E. Williams‐Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMolybdeniteBatholithGeochemistryMagmaMolybdenumPlutonDiapirFluid inclusionsPetrologyTectonicsSeismologyMaterials scienceHydrothermal circulationMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Field, petrochemical, and stable isotope data from peraluminous microgranite dikes and their molybdenite-bearing vugs in the Archean Preissac-Lacorne batholith, Québec, provide evidence for the transport and deposition of molybdenum by an aqueous fluid that exsolved from a felsic magma. A model is proposed in which the microgranite-forming liquid fractionated from a magma that was parental to and intruded less-evolved muscovite monzogranite. Fluid saturation is interpreted to have occurred immediately prior to emplacement, allowing sufficient time for small spherical pockets of fluid to form and rise through the liquid but insufficient time for them to leave the system. These fluid pockets scavenged molybdenum and other components during their migration but were frozen in situ to form molybdenite-bearing vugs as a result of the quenching of the magma. We therefore conclude that the vugs are relicts of the exsolved fluid pockets and that the molybdenite in them reflects the concentration of molybdenum in the fluid, estimated from volumetric relationships to have reached ~7800 ppm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207