MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362684906 · doi:10.18778/8331-126-5.04

Kontrasty w przekładzie: porównanie polskich tłumaczeń Obcego Alberta Camus

2023· book-chapter· pl· W4362684906 on OpenAlex
Tomasz Zielnik

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyPhysicsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

W 2021 roku Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy opublikował Obcego Alberta Camus w nowym tłumaczeniu, autorstwa Marka Bieńczyka. Jest to drugi oficjalny przekład Obcego na język polski, poprzedni, autorstwa Marii Zenowicz, został opublikowany w 1958 roku. W artykule autor porównuje oba przekłady, wskazuje niektóre różnice między wersjami oraz stara się odpowiedzieć na pytanie jak nowe tłumaczenie wpłynęło na odbiór dzieła Alberta Camus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it