Identification of quantitative trait loci and development of diagnostic markers for growth habit traits in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE: QTLs for growth habit are identified on Arahy.15 and Arahy.06 in peanut, and diagnostic markers are developed and validated for further use in marker-assisted breeding. Peanut is a unique legume crop because its pods develop and mature underground. The pegs derive from flowers following pollination, then reach the ground and develop into pods in the soil. Pod number per plant is influenced by peanut growth habit (GH) that has been categorized into four types, including erect, bunch, spreading and prostrate. Restricting pod development at the plant base, as would be the case for peanut plants with upright lateral branches, would decrease pod yield. On the other hand, GH characterized by spreading lateral branches on the ground would facilitate pod formation on the nodes, thereby increasing yield potential. We describe herein an investigation into the GH traits of 521 peanut recombinant inbred lines grown in three distinct environments. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for GH were identified on linkage group (LG) 15 between 203.1 and 204.2 cM and on LG 16 from 139.1 to 139.3 cM. Analysis of resequencing data in the identified QTL regions revealed that single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) or insertion and/or deletion (INDEL) at Arahy15.156854742, Arahy15.156931574, Arahy15.156976352 and Arahy06.111973258 may affect the functions of their respective candidate genes, Arahy.QV02Z8, Arahy.509QUQ, Arahy.ATH5WE and Arahy.SC7TJM. These SNPs and INDELs in relation to peanut GH were further developed for KASP genotyping and tested on a panel of 77 peanut accessions with distinct GH features. This study validates four diagnostic markers that may be used to distinguish erect/bunch peanuts from spreading/prostrate peanuts, thereby facilitating marker-assisted selection for GH traits in peanut breeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".