Identification of molecular cell type of breast cancer on digital histopathology images using deep learning and multiplexed fluorescence imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ER, PR (estrogen, progesterone receptor), and HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) status are assessed using immunohistochemistry and reported in standard clinical workflows as they provide valuable information to help treatment planning. The protein Ki67 has also been suggested as a prognostic biomarker but is not routinely evaluated clinically due to insufficient quality assurance. The routine pathological practice usually relies on small biopsies, such that the reduction in consumption is necessary to save materials for special assays. For this purpose, we developed and validated an automatic system for segmenting and identifying the (ER, PR, HER2, Ki67) positive cells from hæmatoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections using multiplexed immunofluorescence (MxIF) images at cellular level as a reference standard. In this study, we used 100 tissue-microarray cores sampled from 56 cases of invasive breast cancer. For ER, we extracted cell nucleus images (HoverNet) from the H&E images and assigned each cell nucleus as ER positive vs. negative based on the corresponding MxIF signals (whole cell segmentation with DeepCSeg) upon H&E to MxIF image registration. We trained a Res-Net 18 and validated the model on a separate test-set for classifying the cells as positive vs. negative for ER, and performed the same experiment for the other three markers. We obtained area-under-the- receiver-operating-characteristic-curves (AUCs) of 0.82 (ER), 0.85 (PR), 0.75 (HER2), 0.82 (Ki67) respectively. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using machine learning to identify molecular status at cellular level directly from the H&E slides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".