Hot workability characteristics of two A335 P92 steels for power plant application: A comparative study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article reports on the workability of two P92 steels having a chromium content of 8.29 and 9.48 wt%. Constitutive equations were used to calculate material parameters describing the hot deformation flow stress. Hot deformation tests were conducted using the Gleeble® 3500 thermomechanical facility. Test conditions were: temperature of 850-1000°C and strain rate of 0.1-10s-1 to a strain of 0.5. The flow stress curve results show that dynamic recovery was the only softening mechanism. A comparative study of the two steels revealed that Cr content had a marginal significance on the flow stress behaviour. Constitutive analysis results of the material parameters were: a stress exponent of 9.0 (P92-A), and 11.0 (P92-B), while the activation energy was 369 kJmol-1 (P92-A), and 472 kJmol-1 (P92-B). A brief explanation of the material parameter results is in this article. A flow stress model was developed to predict the flow stress behaviour of the two P92 steels investigated. The results show that the model accurately predicts the flow stress at all the deformation conditions applied. The statistical parameters showed a good correlation between the predicted and the experimental data. Therefore, this model can be used to develop metal forming schedules for industrial applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".