Geographically consistent hybridization dynamics between the Black-crested and Tufted titmouse with evidence of hybrid zone expansion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We studied hybridization between the Black-crested and Tufted titmouse across two geographically distinct transects that differ in the timing of secondary contact by hundreds to thousands of years. We found that hybridization patterns correspond to localized hybrid swarms and that the titmouse hybrid zone is likely slowly expanding over time, a product of short post-natal dispersal distances coupled with weak or absent selection against admixture. We show the southern part of the hybrid zone located in Texas is four times wider than the northern region of hybridization in Oklahoma, which is likely due to geographic differences in hybrid zone age. Despite differences in width, most individuals in both transects are advanced-generation hybrids and backcrosses, suggesting geographically consistent hybridization dynamics. We documented a strong correlation between genotypes and plumage index, suggesting that hybridization has not yet resulted in the decoupling of plumage and genome-wide ancestry as observed in some other avian hybrid zones. Although our results suggest the ongoing expansion of the hybrid zone, the rate of expansion appears to be slow, on the scale of tens of meters a year, and it will likely take hundreds of thousands to millions of years before homogenization of the parental populations. While we did not find support for partial reproductive isolation in the hybrid zone itself, there is the possibility that ecological or sexual selection limits introgression into allopatric regions. Broadly, the results of our study highlight the value of multiple, geographically distant, transects across a hybrid zone for assessing the evolutionary dynamics of hybridizing lineages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".