MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362729296 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7810076

Allergic Rhinitis and asthma in association with fungal pollution of indoor environments

2023· article· en· W4362729296 on OpenAlexaff
SIBI DAS, SETHI DAS, JIBIN V GLADSTON, Christudas Silvanose

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaEnvironmental healthMedicinePollutionAssociation (psychology)ImmunologyBiologyEcologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allergy or asthma is triggered by inhaling allergens such as dust, mites, pet dander, pollens, and fungal molds. Samples were collected from various indoor environments including air conditioner filters, carpets, indoor plant soil, living room air, and pillow covers of fifty residents living in air-conditioned flats for screening the fungal pollution of indoor environments and their role in allergies and asthma. This study included 30 residents with school-aged children suffering from allergies or asthma and a healthy control group of another 20 other residential indoor environments. The fungi isolated from indoor environments include Aspergillus niger, A. nidulans, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, Alternaria sp., Paeciliomyces species, Bipolaris species, Trichophyton verrucosum, and T. rubrum. Aspergillus species were isolated from all environments while Trichophyton species were only isolated from indoor plant soil. The fungal presence was higher in the indoor environments of group 1 with allergic rhinitis and asthma with a significant p-value <0.00001 showing its role in allergic rhinitis when compared the group 2 without allergy or asthma. The children suffering from allergies and asthma were further grouped into intermittent (70%), persistent (13%), and asthma or allergic asthma (17%) cases based on symptoms and duration. For the treatment of intermittent allergic rhinitis, a combination of oral antihistamines, and nasal decongestants were used, while persistent allergy symptoms were treated with corticosteroids (oral/intranasal), oral antihistamines, and oral leukotriene receptor antagonists. Asthma cases were treated with salbutamol sulfate, a bronchodilator, and oral leukotriene receptor antagonists with a combination of antiallergic treatments. A combination of treatments with improved indoor hygiene showed better relief for allergic rhinitis and asthma and was significantly reduced from persistent symptoms to intermittent or recovered from allergic symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureFrench-language works237,207