Operative Management of Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Instability: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Posttraumatic extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) instability is an increasingly recognized cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain that occurs when the ECU subsheath is disrupted. Purpose The purpose of this systematic review was to assess outcomes of operatively treated posttraumatic ECU instability. Methods A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases was performed using “extensor carpi ulnaris” as the keyword. Studies were systematically screened and data extracted independently by two reviewers. Results Eight retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 97 wrists. The mean age was 32 years (13–61). Patients underwent either primary repair (40%) using sutures and anchors, or reconstruction (60%) using extensor retinaculum flaps. One study performed deepening of the osseous ulnar groove. Two studies compared preoperative and postoperative values. They both reported a significant improvement in pain scores, functional scoring instruments, satisfaction, and grip strength. The rest of the studies reported similarly favorable outcomes across the same outcomes. Concomitant pathologies were identified in 66% of the study population. Complications occurred in 9% of the sample size, including ECU tendinitis, ulnar sensory nerve irritation, and reintervention for concomitant pathology. None of the studies reported recurrence or reruptures. However, five patients (6.7%) did not return to their previous activity level. Conclusion Patients can expect favorable outcomes with a potentially low complication rate. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of the sample population, operative techniques, and outcome measures warrant further standardized studies. Level of Evidence IV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".