Impact of Diabetes Duration on Left Ventricular Mass Regression with Empagliflozin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aims The duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an important determinant of diabetes severity. The EMPA-HEART CardioLink-6 trial reported significant left ventricular (LV) mass indexed to body surface area (LVMi) regression in patients treated with the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) empagliflozin for 6 months. This exploratory sub-analysis of the same trial investigated the association between T2DM duration and LVMi regression. Methods and results A total of 97 individuals with T2DM and coronary artery disease (CAD) were randomly assigned to receive empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo. LVMi was measured at the baseline and 6 month visit using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The study population was divided into those with a baseline T2DM duration <10 years (n = 40) or ≥10 years (n = 57). A linear model adjusting for baseline values in each of the subgroups (ANCOVA) was used to assess the treatment effect of 6 month change in LVMi, LV end systolic volume indexed to body surface area, LV end diastolic volume indexed to body surface area and LV ejection fraction. Patients in the T2DM duration <10 years group (38 males [95.0%], median age 63 [IQR: 55 years to 70 years]) had a median T2DM duration of 4 years (IQR: 2.0 years to 7.0 years). Those in the T2DM duration ≥10 years group (52 males [91.2%], median age 65 [IQR: 57 years to 71 years]) had a median duration of 15 years (IQR: 12 years to 20 years). There was no significant difference in baseline LVMi according to T2DM duration (median 62 g/m2 [IQR: 53.1 g/m2 to 70.0 g/m2] for T2DM duration <10 years; median 57.5 g/m2 [IQR: 52.1 g/m2 to 66.2 g/m2] for T2DM duration ≥10 years; P = 0.11). Empagliflozin was associated with reductions in LVMi irrespective of duration of T2DM above and below 10 years (T2DM duration <10 years group, mean adjusted difference −2.90 g/m2 [95% CI: −6.64 g/m2 to 0.84 g/m2]; T2DM duration ≥10 years group, mean adjusted difference −3.69 g/m2 [95% CI: −0.14 g/m2 to −7.24 g/m2]; Pinteraction = 0.07). Conclusions In the EMPA-HEART CardioLink-6 trial, empagliflozin treatment was associated with reductions in LVMi in people with T2DM and CAD irrespective of the duration of diabetes assessed categorically above and below 10 years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".