Pausing before verb production is associated with mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cognitive dysfunction and communication impairment are common and disabling symptoms in Parkinson's Disease (PD). Action verb deficits occur in PD, but it remains unclear if these impairments are related to motor system dysfunction and/or cognitive decline. The objective of our study was to evaluate relative contributions of cognitive and motor dysfunction to action verb production in naturalistic speech of patients with PD. We proposed that pausing before action-related language is associated with cognitive dysfunction and may serve as a marker of mild cognitive impairment in PD. Method: = 92) were asked to describe the Cookie Theft picture. Speech files were transcribed, segmented into utterances, and verbs classified as action or non-action (auxiliary). We measured silent pauses before verbs and before utterances containing verbs of different classes. Cognitive assessment included Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and neuropsychological tests to categorize PD participants as normal cognition (PD-NC) or mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) based on Movement Disorders Society (MDS) Task Force Tier II criteria. Motor symptoms were assessed using MDS-UPDRS. We performed Wilcoxon rank sum tests to identify differences in pausing between PD-NC and PD-MCI. Logistic regression models using PD-MCI as dependent variables were used to evaluate the association between pause variables and cognitive status. Results: Participants with PD-MCI demonstrated more pausing before and within utterances compared to PD-NC, and the duration of these pauses were correlated with MoCA but not motor severity (MDS-UPDRS). Logistic regression models demonstrated that pauses before action utterances were associated with PD-MCI status, whereas pauses before non-action utterances were not significantly associated with cognitive diagnosis. Conclusion: We characterized pausing patterns in spontaneous speech in PD-MCI, including analysis of pause location with respect to verb class. We identified associations between cognitive status and pausing before utterances containing action verbs. Evaluation of verb-related pauses may be developed into a potentially powerful speech marker tool to detect early cognitive decline in PD and better understand linguistic dysfunction in PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".