MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

YoPose: Yoga Posture Recognition Using Deep Pose Estimation

2022· article· en· W4364305303 on OpenAlexafffund
Miniar Ben Gamra, Moulay A. Akhloufi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersHORIZON EUROPE HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceFlexibility (engineering)Harmony (color)Artificial intelligenceHuman bodyPoseSession (web analytics)Human–computer interactionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Originated in India, yoga is considered a spiritual practice as it brings flexibility, balance, and harmony to both physical and mental health. It becomes the art of healthy living. A variety of positions (also known as asanas) are exercised. Each of them is designed to provide a particular benefit to the body. In contrast, any incorrect action during a yoga session can be harmful to muscles and ligaments. As people are more comfortable with the home workout, the need for an instructor to assess the accuracy of a movement or posture is turned into a need for an auto-guiding framework. Human pose estimation is an important field of research in computer vision. It serves several applications, extending from health monitoring to public safety. As it tackles multiple challenges related to the human posture, it can be used to identify yoga asanas. In this study, we develop a deep-learning self-instruction yoga classifier named YoPose. Based on the pose information, the proposed framework helps individuals to improve their yoga postures by providing personalized feedback. A public dataset including six asanas is used to train and evaluate the model. The introduction of transfer learning and a data augmentation scheme helped to achieve promising results with more than a 98% accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207