MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4364353382 · doi:10.1002/vetr.2832

Copper toxicosis in Bedlington terriers is associated with multiple independent genetic variants

2023· article· en· W4364353382 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Haywood, June Swinburne, Ellen Schofield, Fernando Constantino‐Casas, Penny Watson

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Record · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMissense mutationATP7AMutationExonSingle-nucleotide polymorphismBiologyAlleleGeneticsBreedSNPGenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Bedlington terrier copper toxicosis (CT) is due to a homozygous exon deletion in COMMD1. CT also occurs in Bedlingtons lacking this deletion. An association with two ABCA12 single nuceotide polymorphism (SNP) splice variants was reported. Labrador retriever CT is associated with a missense mutation in ATP7B, and with a protective mutation in ATP7A. METHODS: Liver and DNA samples from 24 affected and 10 unaffected Bedlingtons were assessed for copper and genetic variants. Allelic frequencies were compared. The ATP7B mutation frequency was investigated in 144 dogs of other breeds. RESULTS: The ABCA12 SNPs showed no differences between groups. The COMMD1 deletion was less frequent in unaffected than in affected dogs and in affected dogs post-2001 than pre-2001. The ATP7B mutation was more frequent in affected than unaffected Bedlingtons. Thirty-five of 144 dogs of other breeds were homo- or heterozygous for the ATP7B mutation. The ATP7A mutation was absent from Bedlingtons. LIMITATIONS: Clinical information and qualitative copper measurements were unavailable for most dogs. CONCLUSION: The COMMD1 deletion remains present in Bedlington terriers but is no longer the primary cause of CT. ABCA12 SNPs were not associated with CT. The ATP7B:c.4358G>A mutation was significantly associated with Bedlington CT and was more common in dogs of this breed than in the 144 dogs of other breeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary RecordSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207