Development of Chemical Isotope Labeling Liquid Chromatography Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry for Comprehensive Analysis of Dipeptides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dipeptides have recently attracted considerable attention due to their newly found biological functions and potential biomarkers of diseases. Global analysis of dipeptides (400 common dipeptides in total number) in samples of complex matrices would enable functional studies of dipeptides and biomarker discovery. In this work, we report a method for high-coverage detection and accurate relative quantification of dipeptides. This method is based on differential chemical isotope labeling (CIL) of dipeptides with dansylation and liquid chromatography Orbitrap tandem mass spectrometry (LC-Orbitrap-MS). An optimized LC gradient ensured the separation of dansyl-dipeptides, including positional isomers (e.g., leucine- and isoleucine-containing dipeptides). MS/MS collision energy in Orbitrap MS was optimized to provide characteristic fragment ion information to sequence dansyl-dipeptides. Using the optimized conditions, a CIL standard library consisting of retention time, MS, and MS/MS information of a whole set of 400 dansyl-dipeptides was constructed to facilitate rapid dipeptide identification. For qualitative analysis of dipeptides in real samples, IsoMS data processing software’s parameters were tuned to improve the coverage of dipeptide annotation. Data-dependent acquisition was also carried out to improve the reliability of dipeptide identification. As examples of applications, we successfully identified a total of 321 dipeptides in rice wines and 105 dipeptides in human serum samples. For quantitative analysis, we demonstrated that the intensity ratios of the peak pairs from 96% of the dansyl-dipeptides detectable in a 1:1 mixture of 12 C- and 13 C-labeled rice wine samples were within ±20% of an expected value of 1.0. More than 90% of dipeptides were detected with a relative standard deviation of less than 10%, showing good performance of relative quantification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".