Factors Affecting Innovative Work Behavior among Employees in Algeria Petroleum Sector
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the development of digitalization, there is a growing need for the business organizations to work through some innovative practices.However, such organizational practices are primarily linked with the employees behaviour towards innovation which is further linked with the job demand and learning goal orientation.The purpose of this study is to investigate how job demands (JD) affect innovative work behavior (IWB).Additionally, the study will look into how Learning Goal Orientation (LGO) functions as a mediating factor in the relationship between JD and IWB.Data from 225 employees working in production division of Sonatrach petroleum company in Algerian were gathered via a self-administered survey.Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling was used to analyse the data (PLS-SEM).The study's findings revealed no statistically significant difference in the direct link between JD and IWB.It was found that the LGO mediates the link between JD and IWB to some extent.The finding implies that by emphasising learning goals, firms can proactively enhance individuals' innovativeness at work.Future research should also take into account other crucial factors including job security and the work environment's mediating role in learning goal orientation across various industries and geographical regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it