Cannabinoid receptor agonist attenuates angiotensin II–induced enlargement and mitochondrial dysfunction in rat atrial cardiomyocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pathological remodeling of atrial tissue renders the atria more prone to arrhythmia upon arrival of electrical triggers. Activation of the renin-angiotensin system is an important factor that contributes to atrial remodeling, which may result in atrial hypertrophy and prolongation of P-wave duration. In addition, atrial cardiomyocytes are electrically coupled via gap junctions, and electrical remodeling of connexins may result in dysfunction of coordinated wave propagation within the atria. Currently, there is a lack of effective therapeutic strategies that target atrial remodeling. We previously proposed that cannabinoid receptors (CBR) may have cardioprotective qualities. CB13 is a dual cannabinoid receptor agonist that activates AMPK signaling in ventricular cardiomyocytes. We reported that CB13 attenuates tachypacing-induced shortening of atrial refractoriness and inhibition of AMPK signaling in the rat atria. Here, we evaluated the effects of CB13 on neonatal atrial rat cardiomyocytes (NRAM) stimulated by angiotensin II (AngII) in terms of atrial myocyte enlargement and mitochondrial function. CB13 inhibited AngII-induced enhancement of atrial myocyte surface area in an AMPK-dependent manner. CB13 also inhibited mitochondrial membrane potential deterioration in the same context. However, AngII and CB13 did not affect mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening. We further demonstrate that CB13 increased Cx43 compared to AngII-treated neonatal rat atrial myocytes. Overall, our results support the notion that CBR activation promotes atrial AMPK activation, and prevents myocyte enlargement (an indicator that suggests pathological hypertrophy), mitochondrial depolarization and Cx43 destabilization. Therefore, peripheral CBR activation should be further tested as a novel treatment strategy in the context of atrial remodeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".