MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4364360245 · doi:10.1002/mdc3.13751

Impact of the Dopamine System on Long‐Term Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson Disease: An Exploratory Study

2023· article· en· W4364360245 on OpenAlex
Daniel Weintraub, Marina Picillo, Hyunkeun Ryan Cho, Chelsea Caspell‐Garcia, Cornelis Blauwendraat, Ethan Brown, Lana M. Chahine, Christopher S. Coffey, Roseanne D. Dobkin, Tatiana Foroud, Doug Galasko, Karl Kieburtz, Kenneth Marek, Kalpana Merchant, Brit Mollenhauer, Kathleen L. Poston, Tanya Simuni, Andrew Siderowf, Andrew Singleton, John Seibyl, Caroline M. Tanner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsParkinson's diseaseDopamine transporterDementiaDopaminePsychologyLevodopaMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMovement disordersNeuropsychologyCohortInternal medicineCognitionDiseaseDopaminergicPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Little is known about the impact of the dopamine system on development of cognitive impairment (CI) in Parkinson disease (PD). Objectives We used data from a multi‐site, international, prospective cohort study to explore the impact of dopamine system‐related biomarkers on CI in PD. Methods PD participants were assessed annually from disease onset out to 7 years, and CI determined by applying cut‐offs to four measures: (1) Montreal Cognitive Assessment; (2) detailed neuropsychological test battery; (3) Movement Disorder Society‐Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS) cognition score; and (4) site investigator diagnosis of CI (mild cognitive impairment or dementia). The dopamine system was assessed by serial Iodine‐123 Ioflupane dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging, genotyping, and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) recorded at each assessment. Multivariate longitudinal analyses, with adjustment for multiple comparisons, determined the association between dopamine system‐related biomarkers and CI, including persistent impairment. Results Demographic and clinical variables associated with CI were higher age, male sex, lower education, non‐White race, higher depression and anxiety scores and higher MDS‐UPDRS motor score. For the dopamine system, lower baseline mean striatum dopamine transporter values ( P range 0.003–0.005) and higher LEDD over time ( P range <0.001–0.01) were significantly associated with increased risk for CI. Conclusions Our results provide preliminary evidence that alterations in the dopamine system predict development of clinically‐relevant, cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. If replicated and determined to be causative, they demonstrate that the dopamine system is instrumental to cognitive health status throughout the disease course. TRIAL REGISTRATION Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01141023).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.872

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it