Probe capture enrichment sequencing of <i>amoA</i> genes discloses diverse ammonia-oxidizing archaeal and bacterial populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The ammonia monooxygenase subunit A ( amoA ) gene has been used to investigate the phylogenetic diversity, spatial distribution, and activity of ammonia-oxidizing archaeal (AOA) and bacterial (AOB), which contribute significantly to the nitrogen cycle in various ecosystems. Amplicon sequencing of amoA is a widely used method; however, it produces inaccurate results owing to the lack of a ‘universal’ primer set. Moreover, currently available primer sets suffer from amplification biases, which can lead to severe misinterpretation. Although shotgun metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses are alternative approaches without amplification bias, the low concentration of target genes in heterogeneous environmental DNA restricts a comprehensive analysis to a realizable sequencing depth. In this study, we developed a method for amoA enrichment sequencing using a hybridization capture technique. Using metagenomic mock community samples, our approach effectively enriched amoA genes with low compositional changes, outperforming amplification and meta-omics sequencing analyses. Following the analysis of metatranscriptomic marine samples, we predicted 80 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) assigned to either AOA or AOB, of which 30 OTUs were unidentified using simple metatranscriptomic or amoA gene amplicon sequencing. Mapped read ratios to all the detected OTUs were significantly higher for the capture samples (50.4 ± 27.2%) than for non-capture samples (0.05 ± 0.02%), demonstrating the high enrichment efficiency of the method. The analysis also revealed the spatial diversity of AOA ecotypes with high sensitivity and phylogenetic resolution, which are difficult to examine using conventional approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".