MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4364858854 · doi:10.46692/9781447343912.034

Growing a movement: the Canadian context

2018· other· en· W4364858854 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roderick Benns, Jenna van Draanen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovement (music)Context (archaeology)GeographyArchaeologyArtAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

‘If a wealthy, G7 nation like Canada were to adopt some form of basic income policy, it would surely signal a social economy revolution for the world.’ Every great movement springs from the unmet needs of the people. Every successful movement occurs when those same needs are recognised by a willing faction of innovative policymakers, not afraid to challenge the old ways. Here, then, is the basic income movement in Canada, on the cusp of convergence of these two truths. On the one hand, a precarious class of people has emerged, made up of lower income workers trapped in part-time work, millennials feeling a sense of career frustration and urgency, and educated professionals trapped in perennial cycles of contract work. The same story plays out in the UK, US, and other western nations. On the other hand, there is growing high level political support across all three levels of Canada’s political system – municipal, provincial, and federal – to remedy this through some form of guaranteed minimum income. A health imperative Basic income manages to straddle a broad range of critical public policy, and none as important as health. There is strong evidence of its potential benefits from the health sector, and especially from research that demonstrates the impact of the social determinants of health on entire populations. There is also strong support alongside this evidence from many health organisations and health practitioners within local, provincial, and national public health organisations across Canada. The Alberta and Ontario Public Health Associations have made clear statements of support. A growing number of local health units from municipalities across Canada’s largest province, Ontario, have endorsed the concept of a basic income including the Haliburton, Kawartha Pine Ridge, Simcoe Muskoka, and Sudbury District Health Units. The Association of Local Public Health Agencies and the Ontario Boards of Health have also endorsed basic income and are requesting that the federal ministers across a broad range of government ministries prioritise ‘joint federal-consideration and investigation into a basic income guarantee as a policy option for reducing poverty and income insecurity.’ Key medical associations in the country have also given support for a basic income along with the Canadian Medical Association.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0850.027
Scholarly communication0.0220.007
Open science0.0060.013
Research integrity0.0090.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→