MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365143448 · doi:10.4271/2023-01-0722

Virtual Accelerometer Approach to Create Vibration Profile for Automotive Component Shake Test

2023· article· en· W4365143448 on OpenAlexaff
Weidong Zhang, Liang Wang, Guanmin Feng, Chandramouli Tangella, Vivek Kirtane, John E. Morley

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsChrysler (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccelerationAccelerometerVibrationFrequency domainAutomotive industryShakerTransmissibility (structural dynamics)Computer scienceEngineeringTime domainSimulationStructural engineeringAcousticsVibration isolationAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vibration shaker testing is a great tool of validating the vibration fatigue performance of automotive components & systems. However, the representative vibration schedule requires a pre-knowledge of the acceleration history for the test object, which usually is not available until the later development phase of a vehicle program when physical properties are available. Sometimes, a generic vibration schedule developed from the worst-case loading profiles are used with risk of lacking correlation with later full vehicle durability test such as Road Test Simulator (RTS) or Proving Ground (PG) road test due to the higher loading amplitude. This paper proposes a virtual accelerometer approach to collect acceleration responses of a component from a virtual vehicle model. First, a multiple body dynamic model will be produced for virtual load calculation over a series of digitalized virtual proving ground road profiles. These loads will be then applied on the virtual vehicle CAE model with all representative components & subsystems. Acceleration response for the system of interest is then extracted from modal transient dynamic analysis. Later, the acceleration history is converted to frequency domain, and the associated spectral damage calculation is conducted. The final vibration profile is developed based on the equivalent damage concept. The virtual acceleration acquisition and physical acceleration acquisition show good agreement in both time domain and frequency domain. The profile generated from virtual acceleration acquisition covers very well for the physical acceleration acquisition. Overall, virtual acceleration-based profile ensures the conservative shake test results for the example studied. Compared to the physical accelerometer, the virtual accelerometer can provide acceleration data economically and quickly in the early phase of the product development. The proposed approach will ensure the component shaker test is conducted using the meaningful and representative vibration load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207