MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365148764 · doi:10.1002/jwmg.22403

Multi‐level habitat selection of boreal breeding mallards

2023· article· en· W4365148764 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ryan Patrick Hilson Johnstone, Matthew E. Dyson, Stuart M. Slattery, Bradley C. Fedy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wildlife Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsDucks Unlimited CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada
KeywordsHabitatEcologyAnasTaigaMarshGeographyBorealRange (aeronautics)SwampSeasonal breederWetlandBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Canada's western boreal forest is a vital breeding habitat for North American duck populations. This region has experienced considerable demand for its valuable natural resources (e.g., oil and gas, forestry) resulting in extensive industrial development (e.g., infrastructure), which is predicted to continue. The potential effects of industrial development on breeding ducks in the western boreal forest, however, remains largely unexplored. We used backpack harness global positioning system (GPS) transmitters to document habitat selection by breeding female mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) across a gradient of industrial development in the western boreal forest of Alberta, Canada. We modeled breeding home range (second order) selection and habitat selection within the home range (third order) using resource selection functions, and spatially predicted our models across the landscape to highlight important breeding habitat. Contrary to our predictions, breeding female mallards did not avoid all industrial development at the second and third orders. Females established home ranges (second order) with greater proportions of marsh, graminoid fen, and well pads, and lower proportions of forest. Within their home range (third order), females selected shrub swamp, graminoid fen, marsh, well pads, and borrow pits, and avoided open water, swamp, treed peatland, forest, forest harvest areas, and industrials (e.g., buildings). Females also selected habitat that was close to pipelines and roads. Our results suggest that the magnitude and direction of breeding season habitat selection by female mallards varies depending on the scale and landscape features, but current levels of industrial development within our study area still allowed for the establishment of breeding season home ranges. Our spatially predicted maps contribute to the increasing body of work surrounding boreal waterfowl ecology by highlighting important breeding habitat for mallards in Canada's western boreal forest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wildlife ManagementSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207