Molecular Characterization of Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency in Oman
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most encountered abnormality of red blood cell metabolism worldwide and has a high prevalence in Oman. The objective of the study was to characterize the mutation variants of G6PD deficiency in a cohort of the Omani population with partial and complete enzyme deficiency. Methods: This prospective study included newborns and children less than one year of age with partial or complete G6PD enzyme deficiency identified on routine screening using a fluorescent spot test from 31 January 2017 to 12 September 2017 in Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. The identified samples were analyzed for the presence of C563T, G1003A, and other mutations using direct DNA sequencing of the polymerase chain reaction. Results: Out of 3679 newborn samples screened, 21.0% were found to have complete or partial G6PD enzyme deficiency. A total of 145 participants were included in the genetic analysis, of which 133 (91.7%) were completely deficient in G6PD enzyme activity and 12 (8.3%) had partial deficiency. The Mediterranean variant (C563T) was identified in 129 (89.0%). Other variants were found as follows: eight (5.5%) had variant A-, three (2.1%) had the Chatham variant (G1003A), one (0.7%) had the Cosenza variant, and one (0.7%) had exon 11 variant. No mutation was found in two subjects. Conclusions: The most common mutation in the Omani population is the Mediterranean mutation (C563T) followed by the variant A- mutation. However, not all participants were found to have a mutation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".