HUBUNGAN BREASFEEDING SELF EFFICACY (BSE) TERHADAP KEBERHASILAN PEMBERIAN ASI EKSKLUSIF PADA IBU MENYUSUI DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS REJOSARI KOTA PEKANBARU
Bibliographic record
Abstract

 Breast milk is the best natural food for babies. Breast milk contains various substances that are needed in the process of growth, baby development, health and immunity. There are several factors in facilitating the production and expenditure of breast milk, namely breast care, frequency of breastfeeding, stress and disease or maternal health, consumption of cigarettes or alcohol, contraceptive pills, nutritional intake. According to Riskesdas 2018, exclusive breastfeeding coverage in Indonesia 2014 was 37.3%, 2015 was 55.7%, 2016 was 54%, in 2017 it was 61.33% and in 2018 experienced a very significant decrease of 37.7% . This study aims to determine the relationship between breastfeeding self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding for breastfeeding mothers in the working area of the Rejosari Public Health Center, Pekanbaru City. This study used a cross-sectional design. The population in this study were breastfeeding mothers with a total sample of 50 respondents using purposive sampling technique. The instrument of this research used a questionnaire. The data analysis used is univariate and bivariate analysis. Based on the results of the study, the results of the che square test were obtained with a significance value of 0.022 where <0.05, which means that there is an influence of breastfeeding self-efficacy with the success of exclusive breastfeeding in the working area of the Rejosari Public Health Center, Pekanbaru City. This proves that breastfeeding mothers who have high trust will succeed in providing exclusive breastfeeding to their babies 
 
 Keywords: breasfeeding self efficacy, exslusife breastfeeding
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".