Arterial spin labelling reveals multi-regional cerebral hypoperfusion in patients with transient ischemic attack that are unrelated to ischemia location: A proof-of-concept study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Aims Patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) have a substantially increased risk of early dementia. In this exploratory study, we aim to determine whether patients with TIA have 1) measurable regional cerebral hypoperfusion unrelated to the location of ischemia, and 2) determine the relationship of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) with their cognitive profiles. Methods Patients with TIA ( N = 49) and seventy-nine ( N = 79) age and sex matched controls underwent formal neuropsychological testing and MRI. Quantitative arterial spin labelling rCBF maps (mL/min/100 g) were registered to the corresponding high resolution T1-weighted image. Linear regression was used to determine the association between demographic, clinical and cognitive variables and rCBF. Results Patients with TIA had significantly ( p < 0.05) lower cognitive scores in the MMSE, MOCA, ACE-R, WAIS-IV DS Coding and Trail Making Tests A and B compared to controls. TIA patients had significantly lower rCBF in the left entorhinal cortex ( p = 0.03), right posterior cingulate ( p = 0.04), and right precuneus ( p = 0.05), after adjusting for age and sex, that were unrelated to the regional anatomical volume and DWI positivity. Regional hypoperfusion in the right posterior cingulate and right precuneus was associated with impaired visual memory (BVMT total, p = 0.05 for both regions) and slower processing speed (TMT A, p = 0.04 and p = 0.01), respectively after adjusting for age and sex. Conclusions TIA patients have patterns of regional hypoperfusion in multiple cortical regions unrelated to the parcellated regional anatomical volume or the presence of a DWI lesion. Regional hypoperfusion in patients with TIA may be an early marker conferring risk of future cognitive decline that needs to be confirmed by future studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".