MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract CT171: A first-in-human phase I study of the ATM inhibitor M4076 in patients with advanced solid tumors (DDRiver Solid Tumors 410): Part 1A results

2023· article· en· W4365512340 on OpenAlexaff
Lillian L. Siu, Timothy A. Yap, Sofia Genta, Gregory Pennock, Christine Hicking, Xiaoli You, Jatinder Kaur Mukker, Giuseppe Locatelli, Anthony W. Tolcher

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityPharmacokineticsRashMedicinePharmacodynamicsAdverse effectPharmacologyIn vivoInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract M4076 is a potent and selective oral inhibitor of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), a key kinase of the DNA damage response (DDR) involved in double-strand break repair. Preclinically, M4076 when combined with DNA damage-inducing therapy or other DDR inhibitors caused unrestricted cell cycle progression and DNA damage accumulation, resulting in tumor cell death. Part 1A of this ongoing open-label study (NCT04882917) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of M4076 monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Dose escalation was guided by safety, along with Bayesian analysis, PK, and PD. In total, 22 pts received M4076 at 4 different dose levels (100-400 mg once daily [QD]); 21 pts (95.5%) discontinued treatment (progressive disease: 11 [50%], adverse events [AEs]: 5 [22.7%]). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported in 4 pts. Overall, 6 pts had ≥1 treatment-related AE (TRAE) of Grade ≥3 (including one Grade 4 hypersensitivity). The most common TRAEs were rash and anemia (Table 1). MTD was determined at 300 mg QD. As per preliminary PK across cohorts, M4076 was rapidly absorbed with median Tmax ~0.5-2 h and mean elimination half-life (t1/2) ~2-10 h; exposure increased in a dose-related manner, with minimum accumulation after multiple QD doses. At ≥200 mg QD, unbound steady state plasma concentration exceeded in vivo pCHK2 IC90 throughout the dosing interval. PD evaluation was based on the modulation of γ-H2AX (a direct ATM target) in ex vivo bleomycin stimulated CD45+ lymphocytes, by flow cytometry. Preliminary analyses showed a trend of reduction of γ-H2AX levels from day 1 to day 2, reaching 80-100% of target inhibition on day 2 with the dose range 100-400 mg QD. The MTD of M4076 was determined, and target exposure and engagement were achieved without significant hematological toxicity. Future investigations on M4076 as combination therapy are planned. Table 1. Safety overview Dose (Safety set) Patients with TRAEs (Grade ≥3) DLT analysis set (Patients with ≥80% of the planned dose or DLT per investigator) DLT DLT AE terms 100 mg(n = 2) No n = 2 No NA 200 mg(n = 7) n = 1 (decreased lymphocyte count, maculo-papular rash) n = 5 Yes(n = 1) Grade 3 maculo-papular rash (TRAE, required drug withdrawal; resolved) 300 mg(n = 9) n = 3 (anemia, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis) n = 7 Yes(n = 1) Grade 1 maculo-papular rash; Grade 2 fever (TRAEs, required treatment discontinuation; resolved) 400 mg(n = 4) n = 2 (nausea, maculo-papular rash, hypersensitivity) n = 4 Yes(n = 2) Grade 3 maculo-papular rash (TRAEs, required dose reduction/interruption and/or concomitant medication; resolved) MedDRA version 23.0, NCI-CTCAE version 5.0. Data cutoff: 2 Nov 2022 AE, adverse event; DLT, dose-limiting toxicity; NA, not applicable; TRAE, treatment-related AE Citation Format: Lillian L. Siu, Timothy A. Yap, Sofia Genta, Gregory Pennock, Christine Hicking, Xiaoli You, Jatinder K. Mukker, Giuseppe Locatelli, Anthony W. Tolcher. A first-in-human phase I study of the ATM inhibitor M4076 in patients with advanced solid tumors (DDRiver Solid Tumors 410): Part 1A results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT171.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207