Coupled Resonator-Based Metasurface Reflector with Enhanced Magnitude and Phase Coverage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A metasurface reflector unit cell is proposed for achieving near-complete-range of complex reflectance (i.e., magnitude and phase) for versatile beamforming capabilities. The unit cell is based on coplanar coupled resonators: a split ring resonator (SRR) with a lumped capacitor and a lumped resistor, and a dipole ring resonator (DRR) with another lumped capacitor. The DRR inserted inside the SRR creates a coupled resonance configuration which results in an enhanced complex reflectance range at the desired frequency. To provide a physical insight and explain the operation principle of the structure, the response of the unit cell is modeled as a coupled Lorentz oscillator via the effective surface susceptibilities, where a unique plasma, damping constant, and resonant frequency can be attributed to each resonator. The proposed unit cell is demonstrated in an array configuration for linear-polarized beamforming, where full-wave simulations are used to demonstrate beam-steering, gain control, side-lobe level control and dual- and triple-beam generation, as illustrative examples. Finally experimental demonstration is performed to validate the full-wave results and obtain in-depth electrical characterization of the reflectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".