MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4365935949 · doi:10.1177/2050313x231164271

Upadacitinib-induced paradoxical face and scalp dermatitis: A case report of a novel sequela

2023· article· en· W4365935949 on OpenAlexaff
Elena Pastukhova, Alison Spurr, Quentin Nakonechny, Jennifer Lipson

Bibliographic record

VenueSAGE Open Medical Case Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtopic dermatitisJanus kinaseDermatologySequelaPathogenesisSeborrheic dermatitisImmunologyImmune systemScalpJanus kinase inhibitorCytokineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, pruritic inflammatory cutaneous condition that can carry significant morbidity. Severe or recalcitrant atopic dermatitis is often treated with immunosuppressants, biologics, or immune-modulating small molecule therapies. The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway is highly implicated in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis, and agents that inhibit Janus kinase signalling are new to the atopic dermatitis landscape. Upadacitinib is a JAK1 inhibitor that has a good safety and efficacy profile and is increasingly being prescribed for atopic dermatitis. We report a case of a 35-year-old male with extensive atopic dermatitis that initially improved significantly on upadacitinib, then after 6 months developed a severe crusted dermatitic eruption on the head favouring a seborrheic distribution. While the pathogenesis of this paradoxical reaction is unclear, this phenomenon may involve a shift to a more Th1/Th17-mediated immune response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAGE Open Medical Case ReportsSame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207