Temporarily summer-stratified lakes are common: profile data from 436 lakes in lowland Denmark
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lakes that undergo temporary stratification in summer do not fit into the classic categorisation of polymictic or dimictic lakes, but how common are they and what are the effects of stratification on the development of anoxia? We used monthly and bimonthly (twice per month) temperature and oxygen profile data from 436 Danish lakes (area range 1–3954 ha, maximum depth range 1.3–45 m) and defined a stratification indicator based on the temperature difference between the upper and lower 2 m of the water column. The stratification indicator had values between −1.6 and 17.7 °C and was significantly and strongly related to lake maximum depth and significantly but less strongly related to lake area. The indicator was highly variable, especially in lakes with maximum depths between 4 and 10 m, where intermediate indicator values suggest one or several mixing events during summer. The dissolved oxygen concentration in summer at the bottom was often <1 mg/L, even when the difference between top and bottom temperature was as low as 0.5–1.0 °C. Temporarily stratifying lakes with frequent mixing events over the summer are probably common in temperate lowland areas but are easily overlooked in routine monitoring programs. Temporary stratification has pronounced implications for the oxygen concentrations and potentially also for the biota and interactions between sediment and water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".