Bibliographic record
Abstract
sb ook offers its readers an ew set of concepts and empirical studies that deepen and challengethe established understandings about politics of Holocaust remembrance. Braidingtogether questions of public narrativization and historical emplotment of the Holocaust,the international human rights project and the imperative of contemporary museums to educatea nd raise awareness, Memorialising the Holocaust in Human Rights Museums shows with admirable deftness that museums, no less than prisons, clinics, or laboratories,a re sites of discursiveo perations of power,d iscipline, and docile embodiment. While Antweiler skilfullynavigates the empirical field of debates,exhibitions, installations, artefacts, and ideas found in threem useums of Holocaust remembrance in Germany, Canada,a nd South Africa, she alson eedst ob ec redited with paying careful attention to whati sn ot seen-to discursive inconsistencies and omissions she encountered duringh er fieldwork, to mnemonic myopias and exclusions, to tacit interests and agendas, as well as to power relations and structures of domination that remain hiddenf rom view.I ne ffect,t he book masterfullyc ritiques the presumed reparative effects of contemporary curatorial practices and acts of 'puttingm emory on display'-acts that Antweiler aptlyd ubs 'exhibitionary atonement'-and thus stipulatesa ni mportant reflection about the political frameworks of visibilityinr elation to the broader narrativeso fr edress for historical wrongdoing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.044 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".