Bibliographic record
Abstract
Katrin Antweiler'sb ook offers its readers an ew set of concepts and empirical studies that deepen and challengethe established understandings about politics of Holocaust remembrance.Braidingtogether questions of public narrativization and historical emplotment of the Holocaust,the international human rights project and the imperative of contemporary museums to educatea nd raise awareness, Memorialising the Holocaust in Human Rights Museums shows with admirable deftness that museums, no less than prisons, clinics, or laboratories,a re sites of discursiveo perations of power,d iscipline, and docile embodiment.While Antweiler skilfullynavigates the empirical field of debates,exhibitions, installations, artefacts, and ideas found in threem useums of Holocaust remembrance in Germany, Canada,a nd South Africa, she alson eedst ob ec redited with paying careful attention to whati sn ot seen-to discursive inconsistencies and omissions she encountered duringh er fieldwork, to mnemonic myopias and exclusions, to tacit interests and agendas, as well as to power relations and structures of domination that remain hiddenf rom view.I ne ffect,t he book masterfullyc ritiques the presumed reparative effects of contemporary curatorial practices and acts of 'puttingm emory on display'-acts that Antweiler aptlyd ubs 'exhibitionary atonement'-and thus stipulatesa ni mportant reflection about the political frameworks of visibilityinr elation to the broader narrativeso fr edress for historical wrongdoing.By meticulously demonstratingits central premise-that the wayweremember the painful and difficult past is inseparable from the emergence of truth regimes, dominant norms, and citizen-subjects-the book casts into stark relief the key problem of global governmentality and globalcitizenship: thatthe notionof shared humanity and of the human as au niversal rights holder is ap olitically contested and ethicallys uspect category.D rawing expertlyo nawide spectrum of scholarlyt extsf rom memory and museum studies, governmentality theory, human rights museology, post-colonial debates, and critiquesofneo-liberalism, Memorialising the Holocaust in Human Rights Museums presents the political and ethical implications of the imbricationofhuman rights with mnemonic discourses, museumdisplays,and educational programs with clarity,eloquence, and sophistication.If indeed the provocative thesis at the heart of the book is correct-that museums' capacity to disseminate knowledge and to produce memory is inseparable from the social processes of subjectification-how do we respond to these interpellations into position of moral innocence, dutiful and compassionate citizenship, and 'norm entrepreneurship'?E quallyc ritical of narrativeso fp rog-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.811 | 0.712 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".