MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366201187 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3267746

B-NER: A Novel Bangla Named Entity Recognition Dataset With Largest Entities and Its Baseline Evaluation

2023· article· en· W4366201187 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNamed-entity recognitionComputer scienceBengaliNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceEntity linkingBaseline (sea)Benchmark (surveying)SentenceF1 scoreTask (project management)Information retrieval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the Natural Language Processing (NLP) framework, Named Entity Recognition (NER) is regarded as the basis for extracting key information to understand texts in any language. As Bangla is a highly inflectional, morphologically rich, and resource-scarce language, building a balanced NER corpus with large and diverse entities is a demanding task. However, previously developed Bangla NER systems are limited to recognizing only three familiar entities: person, location, and organization. To address this significant limitation, we introduce a novel Bangla NER dataset B-NER, which was created using 22,144 manually annotated Bangla sentences collected from Bangla newspapers and Bangla Wikipedia. This dataset includes a total of 9,895 unique words which were manually categorized into eight different entity types, such as a person, organization, event, artifact, time indicator, natural phenomenon, geopolitical entity, and geographical location. Inter-annotator agreement experiments were conducted to validate the quality of annotations performed by three annotators, resulting in a Kappa score of 0.82. In this paper, we provide an outline of the annotation guideline illustrated with examples, discuss the B-NER dataset properties, and present benchmark evaluations of the dataset. To establish that B-NER is more comprehensive and balanced in comparison to other publicly accessible datasets, we conducted cross-dataset modeling and validation, i.e. trained NER model on one dataset while tested on another, and found that the model trained on B-NER performed the best in that settings. Furthermore, we performed exhaustive benchmark evaluations based on Bidirectional LSTM with fastText embeddings and sentence transformer models. Among these models, fine-tuned IndicBERT achieved noticeable results with a Macro-F1 of 86%. This dataset and baseline results will be publicly available under a CC-BY 4.0 license in the CoNLL-2002 format to facilitate further research on Bangla NER.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicTopic ModelingFrench-language works237,207