Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamic path optimization is an important part of intelligent transportation systems (ITSs). Aiming at the shortcomings of the current dynamic path optimization method, the improved ant colony algorithm was used to optimize the dynamic path. Through the actual investigation and analysis, the influencing factors of the multiobjective planning model were determined. The ant colony algorithm was improved by using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to transform path length, travel time, and traffic flow into the comprehensive weight-influencing factor. Meanwhile, directional guidance and dynamic optimization were introduced to the improved ant colony algorithm. In the simulated road network, the length of the optimal path obtained by the improved ant colony algorithm in the simulation road network is 3.015, which is longer than the length of the optimal path obtained by the basic ant colony algorithm (2.902). The travel time of the optimal path obtained by the improved ant colony algorithm (376 s) is significantly shorter than that of the basic ant colony algorithm (416.3 s). The number of iterations of the improved ant colony algorithm (45) is less than that of the basic ant colony algorithm (58). In the instance network, the number of iterations of the improved ant colony algorithm (18) is less than that of the basic ant colony algorithm (26). The travel time of the optimal path obtained by the improved ant colony algorithm (377.1 s) is significantly shorter than that of the basic ant colony algorithm (426 s) and the spatial shortest distance algorithm (424 s). Compared with the basic ant colony algorithm and the spatial shortest distance algorithm, the results of the optimal path obtained by the improved ant colony algorithm were more accurate, and the effectiveness of the improved ant colony algorithm was verified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".