Evaluation of the toxicity of WS-5 in a 90-days nose-only exposure in sprague-dawley rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction WS-5 is a flavor ingredient that provides a cooling sensation similar to that of menthol but without the characteristic menthol flavor. In the available toxicological evaluations of WS-5 there was no data specific to inhalation exposure. Methods A 90-days nose-only inhalation study was conducted using Sprague Dawley rats exposed to Filtered air, propylene glycol/glycerin (40/60 by weight; vehicle control), or one of three WS-5 concentrations (0.2, 0.4, or 0.8% by weight) to assess the inhalation toxicity of WS-5. The study design was consistent with the Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation test guideline 413 and included a 28-day and 6-week recovery sacrifices, in addition to the 13-week assessment. Results Food consumption and body weights were unaffected by WS-5 exposure compared to vehicle control or Filtered air. No WS-5 exposure related alterations were observed in serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation, urinalysis or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytology and clinical chemistry. Macroscopic examinations and terminal organ weights revealed no observations associated with exposure to WS-5. Discussion Histopathology findings of alveolar hemorrhage and mixed cell infiltration at the 28-day necropsy were either not present in the WS-5 exposed groups or were present at similar frequencies in the vehicle control and/or Filtered air groups at the 13-weeks necropsy and thus, were not considered to be vehicle control or WS-5 related. Conclusion Based on the absence of adverse effects, the no-observed-adverse effect concentration was considered to be 2.5 mg/L of aerosolized 0.8 w% WS-5 that achieved a mean measured exposure concentration of approximately 18 μg WS-5/L
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".