MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366281366 · doi:10.1093/pasj/psad023

2021 superoutburst of the WZ Sge-type dwarf nova V627 Pegasi lacks an early superhump phase

2023· article· en· W4366281366 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yusuke Tampo, Taichi Kato, Naoto Kojiguchi, S. Yu. Shugarov, Hiroshi Itoh, Katsura Matsumoto, Momoka Nakagawa, Yukitaka Nishida, M. Richmond, Masaaki Shibata, Junpei Ito, Gulchehra Kokhirova, F. Dzh. Rakhmatullaeva, Tamás Tordai, S. Kiyota, Javier Ruiz, Pavol A. Dubovský, Tomáš Medulka, Е. П. Павленко, Oksana I. Antonyuk, A. A. Sosnovskij, A. Baklanov, V. Krushevska, Tonny Vanmunster, Stephen M. Brincat, Charles Galdies, Franz-Josef Hambsch, Daisaku Nogami

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronScience and Technology Facilities CouncilMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaStockholms UniversitetMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVSlovak Academic Information AgencyQueen's UniversityUK Research and InnovationNational Science FoundationUniversity of WashingtonJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceQueen's University BelfastCalifornia Institute of Technology
KeywordsDwarf novaAstrophysicsPhysicsAccretion discRADIUSLow MassAccretion (finance)AstronomyStarsWhite dwarf

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Superoutbursts in WZ Sge-type dwarf novae (DNe) are characterized by both early superhumps and ordinary superhumps originating from the 2 : 1 and 3 : 1 resonances, respectively. However, some WZ Sge-type DNe show a superoutburst lacking early superhumps; it is not well established how these differ from superoutbursts with an early superhump phase. We report time-resolved photometric observations of the WZ Sge-type DN V627 Peg during its 2021 superoutburst. The detection of ordinary superhumps before the superoutburst peak highlights that this 2021 superoutburst of V627 Peg, like that in 2014, did not feature an early superhump phase. The duration of stage B superhumps was slightly longer in the 2010 superoutburst accompanied by early superhumps than that in the 2014 and 2021 superoutbursts, which lacked early superhumps. This result suggests that an accretion disk experiencing the 2 : 1 resonance may have a larger mass at the inner part of the disk and hence needs more time for the inner disk to become eccentric. The presence of a precursor outburst in the 2021 superoutburst suggests that the maximum disk radius should be smaller than that of the 2014 superoutburst, even though the duration of quiescence was longer than that before the 2021 superoutburst. This could be accomplished if the 2021 superoutburst was triggered as an inside-out outburst or if the mass transfer rate in quiescence changes by a factor of two, suggesting that the outburst mechanism and quiescence state of WZ Sge-type DNe may have more variety than ever thought.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of JapanSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207