MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366292016 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2794960/v1

Development and characterization of a fecal-induced peritonitis model of murine sepsis: results from a multi-laboratory study and iterative modification of experimental conditions

2023· preprint· en· W4366292016 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Neha Sharma, Damian Chwastek, Dhruva J. Dwivedi, Jared Schlechte, Ian-Ling Yu, Braedon McDonald, Jaskirat Arora, Erblin Cani, Mikaela Eng, Doreen Engleberts, Eva Kuhar, Sarah K. Medeiros, Stephane L. Bourque, Gediminas Cepinskas, Sean E. Gill, Forough Jahandideh, Kimberly F. Macala, Sareh Panahi, Cynthia Pape, David Sontag, Janet Sunohara-Neilson, Dean Fergusson, Alison Fox‐Robichaud, Patricia C. Liaw, Manoj M. Lalu, Asher A. Mendelson

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of CalgaryRoyal Alexandra HospitalThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaMcMaster UniversityUniversity of ManitobaOttawa Hospital
FundersOttawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds AssociationManitoba Medical Service FoundationMcMaster UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRoyal Alexandra Hospital FoundationUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsPeritonitisFecesSepsisMedicineInternal medicineBiologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Preclinical sepsis models have been criticized for their inability to recapitulate human sepsis and suffer from methodological shortcomings that limit external validity and reproducibility. The National Preclinical Sepsis Platform (NPSP) is a consortium of basic science researchers, veterinarians, and stakeholders in Canada undertaking standardized multi-laboratory sepsis research to increase the efficacy and efficiency of bench-to-bedside translation. In this study, we aimed to develop and characterize a 72-hour fecal-induced peritonitis (FIP) model of murine sepsis conducted in two independent laboratories. The experimental protocol was optimized by sequentially modifying dose of fecal slurry and timing of antibiotics in an iterative fashion, and then repeating the experimental series at site 1 and site 2. Results: Escalating doses of fecal slurry (0.5 to 2.5 mg/g) resulted in increased disease severity, as assessed by the modified Murine Sepsis Score (MSS), with either minimal (< 20%) or severe (> 60%) mortality outcomes. However, the MSS was a poor predictor of progression to death during the experiments, and mice were found dead without elevated MSS scores. Administration of antibiotics within 4 hours of inoculation rescued the animals from sepsis, as evidenced by 100% survival and reduced bacterial load in peritoneum and blood, compared with late administration of antibiotics after 12 hours. Site 1 and site 2 had statistically significant differences in mortality (60% vs 88%; p < 0.05) for the same dose of fecal slurry (0.75 mg/g) and marked difference in temperature between groups. Microbiome analysis between two batches of fecal slurry revealed differences in beta-diversity and differential abundance analysis, which correlated with differences in mortality in two separate experimental series. Conclusions: We demonstrate a systematic approach to optimizing a 72-hour FIP model of murine sepsis for use in multi-laboratory studies. Alterations to experimental conditions, such as dose of fecal slurry and timing of antibiotics, have clear impact on outcomes. Differences in mortality between sites despite rigorous standardization warrants further investigations to better understand inter-laboratory variation and methodological design in preclinical studies. The use of surrogate mortality endpoints in preclinical sepsis models may introduce bias in evaluation and analysis of outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.213
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207