MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366319074 · doi:10.5114/fmpcr.2023.125493

Study of exclusive breastfeeding behaviour based on the theory of planned behaviour in pregnant women in Isfahan in 2021

2023· article· en· W4366319074 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ghazal Khanjari, MAJID RAHIMI, Narges Kalantari, SHAGHAYEGH AFSHAR, AZARDOKHT CHAHARLANG, FARAHNAZ DEHGHANI, MAHBOOBEH AMINI, Mohammad Javad Tarrahi

Bibliographic record

VenueFamily Medicine & Primary Care Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingMedicinePrimary careTraditional medicineFamily medicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Literature search, G -Funds CollectionBackground.Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) refers to feeding the baby with breast milk until the end of six months after birth.Objectives.This study aimed to study EBF behaviour based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) in pregnant women in Isfahan in 2021.Material and methods.This cross-sectional study was conducted on 441 pregnant women in Isfahan with more than 20 weeks of pregnancy in 2021.The TPB constructs such as behavioural beliefs, outcome evaluation, normative beliefs, motivation to follow, control beliefs, perceived power, and behavioural intent on exclusive feeding behaviour were assessed.Sampling was simple randomised.We used an online questionnaire based on TPB constructs.The data was analysed with descriptive and analytic statistic.Results.The mean age of participants was 29.82 ± 5.138 years.There was a positive and significant relationship between the constructs of behavioural beliefs, normative beliefs, motivation to follow, control beliefs, perceived power (p = 0.000) and outcome evaluation (p = 0.002) with the intention of behaviour and an inverse relationship between these constructs and behaviour (p < 0.05).However, there was a significant relationship between the number of children and the decision for the type of delivery (p < 0.001) and the type of pregnancy (p = 0.014) with the intention of EBF behaviour (p < 0.05).The variables of behavioural beliefs, outcome evaluation, control beliefs and intention were selected as the most critical structures for predicting behaviour.According to this model, 29.1% of changes in EBF behaviour with these structures are also predicted. Conclusions.Based on the results, unplanned pregnancy and the decision for the type of delivery had a significant relationship with behavioural intention for EBF.Thus, effective education concerning positive attitudes and support in performing EBF are necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFamily Medicine & Primary Care ReviewSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207