nELISA: A high-throughput, high-plex platform enables quantitative profiling of the inflammatory secretome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the nELISA, a high-throughput, high-fidelity, and high-plex protein profiling platform. DNA oligonucleotides are used to pre-assemble antibody pairs on spectrally encoded microparticles and perform displacement-mediated detection. Spatial separation between non-cognate antibodies prevents the rise of reagent-driven cross-reactivity, while read-out is performed cost-efficiently and at high-throughput using flow cytometry. nELISA can measure both protein concentration and their post-translational modifications. We assembled an inflammatory panel of 191 targets that were multiplexed without cross-reactivity nor impact on performance vs 1-plex signals, with sensitivities as low as 0.1 pg/mL and measurements spanning 7 orders of magnitude. We then performed a large-scale inflammatory-secretome perturbation screen of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), with cytokines as both perturbagens and readouts, measuring 7,392 samples and generating ~1.4M protein data points in under a week; a significant advance in throughput compared to other highly multiplexed immunoassays. We uncovered 447 significant cytokine responses, including multiple putatively novel ones, that were conserved across donors and stimulation conditions. We validate nELISA for phenotypic screening, where its capacity to faithfully report hundreds of proteins make it a powerful tool across multiple stages of drug discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".