MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4366382529 · doi:10.4050/f-0077-2021-16890

Digital Displacement Hydrostatic Transmission for Rotorcraft and Distributed Propulsion

2021· article· en· W4366382529 on OpenAlexaff
Niall Caldwell, David Rancourt, Peter McCurry, Uwe Stein

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropulsionPowertrainPayload (computing)Rotor (electric)Automotive engineeringController (irrigation)EngineeringComputer scienceAerospace engineeringTorqueMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a new series-hybrid digital transmission technology for distributed propulsion systems offering a lower cost, a lighter weight and more environmental tolerance than series-electric-hybrid powertrains. In particular, this concept can be used on large multicopters for applications requiring long range, heavy payloads and continuous hover, such as offshore search and rescue, surveillance and logistics. The concept, design principles and analysis are described to allow component sizing and calculation of operating point under steady state and dynamic conditions. A design is described for a quadcopter with maximum take-off weight of 380kg, including a Rotax 915 engine, a Digital Displacement® hydraulic pump and bent-axis motors. The components of the propulsion system are described and compared to an equivalent electric system, showing lower cost and weight, and similar efficiency. A computationally efficient model is described of the rotor behavior allowing rapid simulation with accurate rotor loads. A 6 DOF vehicle simulation is described, including dynamics of the proposed system, coupled to a flight controller. Results show that such a standard flight controller can fly the proposed system under a range of conditions including at the engine power limit. The expected flight endurance of the 380kg quadcopter is over 6 hours and range over 1000km depending on payload. Test rigs are described, including at full scale for the 380 kg study, which demonstrate stable control of hover. Other applications for distributed propulsion are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207