An Improved Forest Fire and Smoke Detection Model Based on YOLOv5
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forest fires are destructive and rapidly spreading, causing great harm to forest ecosystems and humans. Deep learning techniques can adaptively learn and extract features of forest fires and smoke. However, the complex backgrounds and different forest fire and smoke features in captured forest fire images make detection difficult. Facing the complex background of forest fire smoke, it is difficult for traditional machine learning methods to design a general feature extraction module for feature extraction. Deep learning methods are effective in many fields, so this paper improves on the You Only Look Once v5 (YOLOv5s) model, and the improved model has better detection performance for forest fires and smoke. First, a coordinate attention (CA) model is integrated into the YOLOv5 model to highlight fire smoke targets and improve the identifiability of different smoke features. Second, we replaced YOLOv5s original spatial pyramidal ensemble fast (SPPF) module with a receptive field block (RFB) module to enable better focus on the global information of different fires. Third, the path aggregation network (PANet) of the neck structure in the YOLOv5s model is improved to a bi-directional feature pyramid network (Bi-FPN). Compared with the YOLOv5 model, our improved forest fire and smoke detection model at mAP@0.5 improves by 5.1%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it